
“Psyche profiles said you would be amenable for coercion.”
Deputy Sheriff Eddie Colburn was matter-of-fact in his delivery, and his words were in accord with everything we understood of the man. He trusted Anthony Cooper and lost a kidney, then his self-respect, and finally his ability to walk. He trusted Benjamin Linus, and received in payment for his good faith a brutal strangulation by electric power cable. “Amenable to coercion” was a polite way of stating the obvious: John Locke was gullible.
He cried tears of frustration and disappointment, shouted and railed against Jack, against Ben, against the Island. He had faith and courage, but at critical moments doubt and fear overwhelmed him. When the world was against him, he planned and nearly executed his own demise. He gave up.
Weakness.
In the ordinary world, John Locke was a nobody. Not a single person, other than his most vociferous enemy, grieved his passing.  He was a noisy, ignorant, gullible fool. But that was the reality of the ordinary world, the fragmented, incomplete reality of a world consumed with buying and selling, wealth and power, human creations over divine beings.
The attributes we consider weaknesses were John Locke’s strengths. The world’s measure of John Locke was flawed, warped, inhuman and insane. The Island’s measure of the man was true: Gullibility meant trust; tears meant unwillingness to accept setbacks. And his greatest failure, his inability to convince even one of the Six to return, proved instead to be his greatest strength.
LOST was about our humanity, and the story’s natural narrator was its strongest and most faithful voice:Â Prince of the Island, Man of Faith, John Locke.
Read the rest of this entry »
Tags:
John Locke,
LOST Theories,
Pearson Moore,
recaps&reviews,
Videos
Recent Comments