When we posted the new Season 5 cast group photo two weeks ago, many of you pointed out that Daniel’s foot was missing. Well, you can see that more clear now:
What do you guys think? Is it a Photoshop error or a clue of what’s going to happen to Daniel on Season 5?
Related posts:
-
Complete, Untagged Set of Season 5 Cast Promo Photos (Updated to Ultra High Quality Photos) - Season 5 – Sawyer & Juliet Photo
- New Season 5 Promo Photos?
Tags: Daniel Faraday, Photos & Scans, Season 5
View Comments to “Where’s Faraday’s Foot?”
Leave a Reply
Sign up on Gravatar.com to display an avatar image beside your name.
Rules for commenting.
- The Admins of SL-LOST will not tolerate any form of discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation or religious beliefs.
- Do not be rude: personal attacks and destructive criticism will get you banned.
- Use only English. Please use correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Once you have published your comment, you have 5 minutes to edit it. Do not double post.
- Spoilers are NOT allowed in comments unless the blog post you are discussing contains promos, sneak peeks or clues given by the cast or the writers for upcoming episodes. Even with a “spoiler warning” notice, your comment will get deleted. Remember: SL-LOST.com is not a spoiler site.
- Please keep your comments relevant to the blog entries.
If you don't follow these simple rules you will be permanently banned from SL-LOST.com.
Rules for commenting.
- The Admins of SL-LOST will not tolerate any form of discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation or religious beliefs.
- Do not be rude: personal attacks and destructive criticism will get you banned.
- Use only English. Please use correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
- Please keep your comments relevant to the blog entries.
If you don't follow these simple rules you will be permanently banned from SL-LOST.com.
December 16th, 2008 at 10:22 am
For an error it’s too good. I suppose, it’s a clue about Daniel. My question is just… If he travels in time, does he do it only in his consciousness? Otherwise he would perhaps aleady have only one leg… Or am I wrong with logic now?
December 16th, 2008 at 11:34 am
I’d say your ability to see the inside of the pant leg, and the fact that it’s obviously been painted and shadowed means that it’s likely intentional.
December 16th, 2008 at 11:54 am
Maybe it has something to do with the foot statue on the island…
December 16th, 2008 at 12:04 pm
The statue has 4 toes, not 1 foot!
I mean… originally, the statue, for me, had 2 feet (with 4 toes).
December 16th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
?
I see his foot, it is cocked to the side….you can see the heel and the leaves are hiding everything else.
December 16th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
I disagree Leroi
I think that the foot is missing.
December 16th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
he won’t weak up with the left foot.
December 16th, 2008 at 3:11 pm
Have you ever thought about Marvin Candle’s bzw. Mark Wickmund’s bzw. [Pierre Chengs] missing arm bzw. his artificial limb? Maybe that’s the connection … Well, at least some kind of congruence.
December 16th, 2008 at 3:13 pm
That’s an interesting theory, radzinsky.
December 16th, 2008 at 3:19 pm
Wow, you guys are stretching for this one–his foot is definitely not missing from the picture. You can actually see the gray or black sock coming out of the side of his right foot, and the black shoe behind parts of the leaves. Besides, the other pictures of Daniel released by ABC from that press release actually show BOTH feet. But, if we used this type of reasoning, Sawyer will be losing both feet, Jack will be losing his left leg, and Desmond will be losing both legs!
December 16th, 2008 at 4:38 pm
if you notice, it just looks like that the shoe is placed a little bit backwards from where his foot should be… maybe he lost both feet and they just decided to put the shoe there for kicks?
December 16th, 2008 at 5:06 pm
The first thing I would like to say is: He’s missing a foot. You can see the pant leg IN FRONT of the leaves.
Second: The person who photoshopped this did a really bad job. You can see he was prabably sitting in a foldout chair. It looks better zoomed out.
December 16th, 2008 at 5:10 pm
@Jered: I don’t get the context of losing feet but anyway … I don’t think there’s supposed to be a shoe behind the leaves, I mean, maybe there is. After all I know about graphic designers, I don’t think the branch is coincidentally placed there. Although, I must admit, there’s a lot of shrubbery around.
December 16th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
@radzinsky: My point was that, simply because we can’t see his foot doesn’t mean he’s lost it. Just like we can’t see other characters’ feet or legs in the picture. But, I will admit, I might have been a little too disbelieving at first. The parallels to Dr. Candle are pretty dead-on.
@Zack: Fair point…seeing the left leg in front of one of the leaves makes me see why people would think it has been purposefully edited to make it seem as if he lost his left foot. But why can’t he simply have placed his foot in the middle of the branch? Occam’s razor and all…
December 16th, 2008 at 6:44 pm
@Jered: yeah, now I get what you meant. And I agree that this whole thing could have been done better.
For example if you look at the angle the light is coming in (you can see it better on the big picture), the upper edge of the left thigh should not be as bright as it is, as it is behind the arm-rest of the chair, and the light is coming from the windows. Anyway, pardon me my strange expression, what I mean is:
This whole left leg seems to be added afterwards.
December 16th, 2008 at 7:38 pm
It is simply a Photoshop error.
December 16th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
Thanks Jered, I am glad someone else agrees with me.
December 16th, 2008 at 8:55 pm
guauuu!!!! just like in movie “back to the future”…..in the family´s photos, do you remember???. Maybe is because he changed something in the past…or in the future…maybe is just coincidence, i don´t know….what do you think about it ???(sorry my english)
December 16th, 2008 at 10:07 pm
Le
“
EXACTLY , spically faraday because we saw him in the past with Marvin Candle
is his leg missing only in one photo or all the photos
“sorry my english
December 17th, 2008 at 12:12 am
It’s a Photoshop “error”. The leaf is covering his foot.
December 17th, 2008 at 9:05 am
If that’s IS a photoshop error… then who ever the designer was and who let it be released like that are in MAJOR trouble. If I ever manipulated a photo and left a mistake like that I would be in trouble with my art director…
That fact alone leads me to believe, either they got rid of his foot (the parts of his ‘foot’, to me, look like they could be shadows on leaves playing tricks) or made it looks like it was gone for a reason. There is no way the art house that did this ad just let something like that slip…
I also have to agree with zack, that this was a quickly and not well done photoshop job all around. parts of it make me cringe)
December 17th, 2008 at 10:57 am
if you zoom in at Charlotte in the group photo you can see her toes are covers by leaves is this a coincidence or a clue to the four toed statue and Charltte who was supposidly born on the island .
December 17th, 2008 at 8:30 pm
ziad.01 I said “sorry my english” because i´m from argentina, and i speak english very well but not excellent, and sometimes i don´t writte quite well.Bye
December 18th, 2008 at 3:33 pm
also miles foot is covered to i think this might be a CLUE yay x
December 19th, 2008 at 1:56 am
It’s defintly intetional..what side tennis shoe is in the tree in the frist season…dont know it its likned..
December 19th, 2008 at 2:06 am
Also..those boot’s look relly relly old…
December 21st, 2008 at 1:48 pm
A photoshop error?
Everything happens for a reason, remember guys?
December 22nd, 2008 at 8:17 pm
In the Dharma videos Candle’s arm looks as though it is fake. Maybe he lost his limb like Daniel while time traveling. There’s a Dharma video which I’m sure you’ve all seen where Daniel’s voice is in the background as though he is filming it. Coincidence? Doubt it. hahaha
December 23rd, 2008 at 12:28 pm
Yeah I don't think this is a coincidence.
December 28th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
if you look the plant is behind his pants
December 29th, 2008 at 6:07 pm
hey brainiacs, take a look at juliet’s left foot.
January 4th, 2009 at 9:57 am
My theory:
daniel was on the rubber boat heading back to the island before it dissapeared. the way I think it happened, he got off the boat and stepped with his right foot on the island a second before it dissapeared but not in time to put both feet on the island.
thus the left foot literaly “stayed behind”.
January 24th, 2009 at 7:12 pm
i dont want to loose my foot, i hope its an error,
February 23rd, 2009 at 8:48 pm
It is a plauseable theory that daniel is being erased with time due to events that have been changed in the past?